<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>China IPR - Intellectual Property Developments in China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinaipr.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinaipr.com</link>
	<description>China: patents, trademarks, copyright, infringement, piracy, innovation policies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:28:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='chinaipr.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://chinaipr.com/osd.xml" title="China IPR - Intellectual Property Developments in China" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://chinaipr.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Simulating the China IPR Enforcement case</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/05/21/simulating-the-china-ipr-enforcement-case/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/05/21/simulating-the-china-ipr-enforcement-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past few years, I have been conducting moot court simulations of DS/362, the WTO US-China IPR “enforcement case” with students and colleagues at Fordham University and elsewhere. The heart of DS/362 was the US’s argument that, by establishing prosecution and conviction thresholds that were too high, China did not provide an adequate criminal [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=352&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/05/21/simulating-the-china-ipr-enforcement-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SIPO announces Annual Strategy and Plans of Implementation for Intellectual Property in 2012</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/16/sipo-announces-annual-strategy-and-plans-of-implementation-for-intellectual-property-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/16/sipo-announces-annual-strategy-and-plans-of-implementation-for-intellectual-property-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese IP Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abnormal patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual Strategy and Plans of Implementation for Intellectual Property 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chen Fuli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Law Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interagency Leading Group on IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Public Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renmin University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme People’s Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xcellent Legal Talent Education and Training Programs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April 26 is International IP day, and in anticipation of the day, Chinese state agencies are announcing plans for intellectual property, releasing statistics, and holding conferences.  The activities during this month are key to analyzing the past year’s performance, and to understand those areas where China will be placing a special emphasis for this year.  [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=349&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/16/sipo-announces-annual-strategy-and-plans-of-implementation-for-intellectual-property-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official announcement of the FCBA Bench and Bar Program in Beijing</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/12/official-announcement-of-the-fcba-bench-and-bar-program-in-beijing/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/12/official-announcement-of-the-fcba-bench-and-bar-program-in-beijing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bench and Bar Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bilateral engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Judge Rader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renmin University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Circuit Bar has just posted the formal announcement of its Bench and Bar program with the China Law Society, which will be hosted at Renmin University May 28-30, with the the support of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Supreme People&#8217;s Court of China, the US Patent and Trademark [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=336&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/12/official-announcement-of-the-fcba-bench-and-bar-program-in-beijing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://chinaipr2.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/wp_000084.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">WP_000084</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia and China Conclude a Patent Prosecution Highway</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/09/russia-and-china-conclude-a-patent-prosecution-highway/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/09/russia-and-china-conclude-a-patent-prosecution-highway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Intellectual Property practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Prosecution Highway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia Federal Intellectual Property Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIPO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a bilateral meeting between China State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) and Russia Federal Intellectual Property Office (FIPO), China and Russia concluded a Memorandum of Understanding on Patent Prosecution Highway between the State Intellectual Property Office of the People&#8217;s Republic of China and the Russian Federal Intellectual Property Office. [detail information in Chinese] The Russian office [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=331&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/09/russia-and-china-conclude-a-patent-prosecution-highway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding China’s New Environment for Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/09/understanding-chinas-new-environment-for-intellectual-property/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/09/understanding-chinas-new-environment-for-intellectual-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese IP Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordham Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months of planning and preparation, Fordham&#8217;s first China focused IP Conference is only two short days away! Registration has been climbing in the last few days, and it is still open. With the range of issues covered and many notable featured speakers from the U.S. and Chinese government and judiciary, academia and practitioners, the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=327&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/09/understanding-chinas-new-environment-for-intellectual-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hon. Denny Chin: The “Jeremy Lin” of the Federal Judiciary</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/hon-denny-chin-the-jeremy-lin-of-the-federal-judiciary/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/hon-denny-chin-the-jeremy-lin-of-the-federal-judiciary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmCham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors Guild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China's New IP Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denny Chin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Bar Circuit Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordham Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google ebooks settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Lin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Chin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Rader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kong XiangJun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ninth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renmin University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Lew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDNY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zhu Li]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/hon-denny-chin-the-jeremy-lin-of-the-federal-judiciary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judicial engagement with China on IP issues has frequently had a markedly different tenor from other forms of engagement, such as executive branch, business, or academic.  Judges carry less political baggage than does executive branch of the government, may be more direct, and can also be more inclined to be more balanced in their approach, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=319&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/hon-denny-chin-the-jeremy-lin-of-the-federal-judiciary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://chinaipr2.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/0271-300x225.jpg?w=290" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Image</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCA Releases draft of proposed amendments to the Copyright Law for Comment</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/nca-releases-draft-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-copyright-law-for-comment/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/nca-releases-draft-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-copyright-law-for-comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Academy of Social Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renmin University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shen Rengan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Handong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zhongnan University of Politics and Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/nca-releases-draft-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-copyright-law-for-comment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 31, 2012 the PRC National Copyright Administration (“NCA”) released for comment the first draft of the proposed amendments to the Copyright law. Comments are due April 30, 2012. (In Chinese): http://www.ncac.gov.cn/cms/html/309/3502/201203/740608.html.  As far as we know the draft is not yet calendared at the State Council, nor at the NPC.  However with the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=316&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/04/03/nca-releases-draft-of-proposed-amendments-to-the-copyright-law-for-comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Other perspectives on Apple/Proview</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/26/other-perspectives-on-appleproview/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/26/other-perspectives-on-appleproview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordham Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administration for Industry and Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme People's Procuratorate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, we had a group of Chinese IP officials visiting Fordham – from Chinese Customs, a local Administration for Industry and Commerce and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate  &#8211; it was a perfect combination of officials to ask about the Apple / Proview case from the perspective of different Chinese government agencies, other than the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=299&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/26/other-perspectives-on-appleproview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Case Filing” In China’s Courts and Their Impact on IP Cases</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/24/case-filing-in-chinas-courts-and-their-impact-on-ip-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/24/case-filing-in-chinas-courts-and-their-impact-on-ip-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China IPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Intellectual Property practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case filing division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil remedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal remedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctive relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP-related civil cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[li'anting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Liu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanping Liu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-line copyright cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-trial preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-trial preservation of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preliminary injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRIPS agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Case Filing” In China’s Courts and Their Impact on IP Cases In my experience over the past decade and talking to local IP courts in China, the IPR judges have for the most part been very forthcoming, knowledgeable and engaging.  However, their colleagues in the Case Filing Division (立案庭) (“CFD”) have operated in a much [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=296&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/24/case-filing-in-chinas-courts-and-their-impact-on-ip-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indigenous Innovation in the Chongqing Police Department</title>
		<link>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/23/indigenous-innovation-in-the-chongqing-police-department/</link>
		<comments>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/23/indigenous-innovation-in-the-chongqing-police-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 04:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chinaipr2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chinese Intellectual Property practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bo Xi Lai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous innovation policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wang lijun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinaipr.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cloud of mystery surrounding Bo Xilai and his former deputy, police chief Wang Lijun continues to loom over the Chinese and western press, with many unresolved questions concerning the circumstances of Wang’s appearance before the US consulate, and the current circumstances of Bo himself. Not many would have expected any discussion of intellectual property [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=chinaipr.com&#038;blog=29516810&#038;post=289&#038;subd=chinaipr2&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chinaipr.com/2012/03/23/indigenous-innovation-in-the-chongqing-police-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fe92b753958f803739666425524840d5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">chinaipr2</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
