Category: UPOV

Using and Misusing Chinese Patent Data

Patent statistics are frequently cited as evidence of China’s growing technological strength, but patent counts by themselves do not address qualitative concerns. Moreover, they often measure much more than innovation alone. They can reflect commercialization strategies, export orientation, government incentives, and differences in patent systems across countries. This article examines how patent data of various kinds can be used to assess China’s competitive position, while also highlighting the limitations of relying on patent counts alone. Drawing on recent U.S.-China filing data, design patent trends, overseas filing behavior, and common measures of patent quality, it argues that patent statistics are most useful when interpreted in context and alongside other indicators of technological and commercial performance.

Reading the SPC IP Court’s 2025 Annual Report: Data, Composition, and Reporting Structure

This post examines the SPC IP Court’s 2025 Annual Report by focusing on underlying data, case composition, and reporting structure rather than headline claims. It shows that foreign participation is concentrated in administrative appeals, that punitive damages and trade secret cases remain a small share of the docket, and that plant variety protection is receiving increased attention. The post argues that careful attention to denominators, omissions, and how data are presented is necessary to understand what the report actually shows.