Seeking Truth Through Facts in Innovation & US-China Relations

A brief essay that reflects on the meaning of “seeking truth through facts” (实事求是) as both a classical Chinese scholarly method and a contemporary challenge in U.S.–China policy discourse. Drawing on its origins in the Book of Han, its later use by Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, and my own experience moderating an Asia Society program on innovation, the piece explores how facts are often distorted by politics, emotion, and narrative convenience. Using examples from intellectual property debates and the misuse of statistics, it argues that factual rigor remains indispensable, especially when facts challenge deeply held beliefs.

Post-Filing Data in Chinese Pharma Patents: Why It Took So Long — and What Finally Worked

Recently, the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) upheld a decision of the Beijing Intellectual Property Court reversing a China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidation decision and confirming the validity of Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide compound patent. Although the final written decision has not yet been publicly released, official summaries indicate that the court accepted post-filing experimental data where “the technical effect can be derived from the original specification” (技术效果可由原说明书得出), reversing an administrative invalidation decision. Public reporting further indicates that the dispute turned on whether CNIPA would accept post-filing experimental data demonstrating semaglutide’s surprising pharmacokinetic effects in animal models, where the application as filed contained no experimental data.

Reforms to China’s Patent Injunction Practice in a Domestic Comparative Perspective

Injunctions in Chinese patent are deeply rooted in Chinese IP civil and administrative practice. Due to the complex nature of China’s legal system, any analysis of the need for reforms to China’s patent litigation system should also take into account the nature of China’s civil patent system, the availability of injunctive-type relief from its administrative system, the potential impact of such reform on other civil remedies., as well as the potential impact on foreign litigants.